Talk:Bachmannia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Requested move 23 September 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Bachmannia be renamed and moved to Bachmannia woodii.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Bachmannia → Bachmannia woodii – The name "Bachmannia" is shared by two monospecific genera: a plant genus (this article) and a fish genus (Bachmannia chubutensis). I don't think either is the primary topic, so they should both be disambiguated. Per WP:MONOTYPICFLORA, it's better to add the specific name than a parenthetical disambiguator like "Bachmannia (plant)". jlwoodwa (talk) 22:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Bachmannia chubutensis has 21 views compared with only 9[[1]] for Bachmannia woodii. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: Not controversial per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA. YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]