Jump to content

Talk:Fyodor Dostoevsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Fyodor Dostoyevsky)
Former good article nomineeFyodor Dostoevsky was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
August 26, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
October 10, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
October 19, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
December 26, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 6, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
January 26, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 1, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
April 4, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 4, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 11, 2017, and November 11, 2021.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Legacy section - draft

[edit]

I think that section is too clunky. I propose a more structured version: {{Collapse|1=

Pre-reform orthography

[edit]

As it's how he would have spelt his name during his day, can the pre-reform spelling of his name, Ѳедоръ Михайловичъ Достоевскій, be included in the article? I'm not sure how to integrate it in the introduction. 2WR1 (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I just found how to format it from a different page, so I'll add it, I've taken it from the Russian Wikipedia page, if anyone has any comments about this let me know. 2WR1 (talk) 06:09, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, sorry, I just found that there is a note at the very bottom of the page about this, linked with a footnote by the name. I feel like the original spelling of his name should be more prominent and displayed in the opening paragraph (see the page Crime and Punishment how this is done for the title of the book). I don't want to mess things up, if anyone has an idea of how to implement this effectively, please go ahead and do it, if you think it would be better not too, please discuss here. 2WR1 (talk) 06:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ancestry

[edit]

There is no need to add the opinions of some left-wing media personalities to the article. If you are quoting, then cite a significant source. Noraskulk (talk) 12:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]