Talk:Mr. McMahon (miniseries)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mr. McMahon (miniseries) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Professional wrestling High‑importance

	Mr. McMahon (miniseries) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy talk 10:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

McMahon in 2006

... that Vince McMahon attempted to buy the rights to the Mr. McMahon documentary, but Netflix refused?

Source: Bleacher Report

ALT1: ... that WWE Hall of Famer Rob Van Dam refused to be interviewed for the Mr. McMahon documentary? Source: The Times Of India
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Chocolate in savory cooking

5x expanded by Royiswariii (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Royiswariii (talk) 16:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:
New enough: - no
Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article is not new enough or expanded within past 5 days according to DYK check. IntentionallyDense (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Note that the article was 952 prose characters long at the end of its first day, 4 September, and it is currently 1911 prose characters, so a 2x expansion over 21 days as opposed to 5x over 7 days (not 5 days). The episodes table does not count at DYK; only prose that isn't part of a list or table counts. The prose count as of 18 September, seven days prior to the nomination, was 1166 prose characters, so the expansion would need to be to 5830 prose characters. This doesn't seem feasible. The best route to a future DYK would be should the article become a Good Article, at which point it could be renominated. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]