Jump to content

Talk:Tayma

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tayma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No source on Nabonidus etc.

[edit]

We have now:
"The last Babylonian king Nabonidus conquered Tayma and for ten years of his reign retired there to worship and search for prophecies, entrusting the kingship of Babylon to his son, Belshazzar. Taymanitic inscriptions also mention that people of Tayma fought wars with Dadān.<ref name=krc2>{{cite web |url=http://krc2.orient.ox.ac.uk/aalc/images/documents/mcam/mcam_ancient_north_arabian.pdf |title=krc2.orient.ox.ac.uk}}{{dead|date=May 2021}}</ref>"

There are no details for the source. The link is dead, and we have no author, title (krc2.orient.ox.ac.uk is anything but), work, year... Nothing, really. It might be a paper by Michael C. A. Macdonald from The Khalili Research Centre, Faculty of Oriental Studies, University of Oxford; or it might have something to do with the OCIANA Corpus of Taymanitic inscriptions co-edited by him and María del Carmen Hidalgo-Chacón, but who can tell? The OCIANA Corpus is here and it does cover Nabonidus spending ten years in Tayma, but it doesn't mention Belshazzar, nor Nabonidus retiring there "to worship and search for prophecies", nor is there any explicit mention of wars with Dadān.

This passage and the source were introduced here by Oranjelo100. Maybe it can be optimised and re-sourced? Cheers, Arminden (talk) 15:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The war with Dedan is mentioned on p7 of Schaudig's article Section 1: Cuneiform Texts from the Saudi-German Excavations at Taymāʾ Seasons 2004–2015.
"There is also a group of graffiti found in the vicinity of Taymā', written in a North-Arabian script, formerly dubbed 'Thamudic A', now 'Taymanitic' (Müller - Al-Said 2001; Hayajneh 2001; Livingstone 2005; Al-Said 2009). Several of these graffitti give the names and professions of individuals who took part in the campaign of Nabonidus in Arabia. The names are commonly regarded as Arabian, and some may even be Greek, possibly as a result of the wars of the Late Babylonian empire on Cilicia during the reigns of Neriglissar and Nabonidus (Sack 1994, 32; Beaulieu 1989, 22. 117. 127). They are however not Judean, as one might have expected, in view of the later Judean traditions about Nabonidus and Taymā.
- PN ḫlm nbnd mlk bb/ "PN, the supporter of Nabonidus, king of Bābil"
- PN sdn mlk bb/ "PN, the guard of the king of Bābil"
Another group of graffiti deals with a "war on Dadan" (ḍr ddn), which is believed to have been part of Nabonidus' extended campaign in Arabia (Winnett - Reed 1970, 90-92 [discussion], 102-103. 105, nos. 20-23. 33)."
On another note, does anyone happen to have a reference for the quotation that it was first called Tiamat? It says Neo-Babylonian sources in the 8th C BCE, which is making me dubious since there wasn't a Neo-Babylonian Empire then. 118.209.212.139 (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

current town details

[edit]

Despite being a town with a population of over 40,000 people, this page provides absolutely no information regarding its modern status found on many pages of much smaller towns 72.235.4.222 (talk) 05:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]