Jump to content

Talk:Thriller (viral video)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is very interesting. You seem to have done a good job. The main problem is that it does not have a bolded opening sentence in lead. Please see Wikipedia:LEAD#Opening_paragraph to see the rules for opening sentences. I stuck a sentence in temporarily as a place holder, but it needs fixing up. Otherwise, I am still reading through the article. You seem to have done a good job of combines sources and rewording the information. I am not sure if two Fair use images can be justified, but that can always be debated.

Mattisse (Talk) 23:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fixes, they were very helpful. :) As you suggested, I've done a slight rewording of the opening sentence. I've also removed the second fair use image, and it has been deleted under F5 of the speedy deletion criteria. Pyrrhus16 08:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • At first I was concerned that you did not have the usual sections, such as "Development", "Release", "Response", "Aftermath" etc. but in looking through the sections again, I have decided that for now the heading adequately capture the contents within each. Refinement of the sections might be something you can consider for the future. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers the context and major aspect b (focused): Remains focused on topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: Neutral
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): The one Fair use image is justified b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good job. Congratulations!

Mattisse (Talk) 15:58, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Thanks. :) Pyrrhus16 16:00, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]