Talk:Typhoon Eli/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 23:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can take this one on. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:41, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

comments

"known in the Philippines as Typhoon Konsing" suggest mentioning in article body so you can move this out of the lede
- It's probably best suited for the lead tbh. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"23 people were hurt" -> " 23 people were injured"? hurt can be a rather vague term
- Sure. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
link Shrimp farming?
- Sure. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
could link Coconut tree and Pepper tree?
- Sure. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest adding a year to the first paragraph in the body to give the reader something to anchor on
- I mean the year is in the title but sure. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Following the recurvature of Typhoon Deanna on July 2" What was Typhoon Deanna? Perhaps one more sentence of introductory set-up would be apt?
- Added a link. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
link Monsoon trough?
- Done. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
is there a link for 'ridging'?
- Added. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"with both the JTWC and JMA also analyzing a peak intensity" suggest removing 'both' because you then go on to talk about how they differ
- Good call. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
" improved drought conditions" -> "alleviated drought conditions"?
- Good call. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
" initial reports of 25 fishermen were" -> "initial reports of 25 fishermen"
- Re-worded anyway because I use the word "reports" and "reported" twice in a sentence. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
source #9 is available for free here
- Replaced. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ref #2 could use page numbers as it's a 200+ page document
- Added. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's all from me. The article otherwise meets GA criteria. Feel free to discuss any of these. Nice work! Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:17, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 16:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yellow Evan, This article is well written, referenced, illustrated, comprehensive and otherwise meets the GA criteria. I'm happy to pass. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]