Jump to content

User talk:Vagary/Infobox Canadian budget

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconCanada: Governments NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Comments

[edit]

How about adding some kind of navigation to the previous and next budget (if there is one)? Also, {{intricate}} should be added. heqs ·:. 12:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not up to speed on the standards for such navigation. Should it be added to the infobox or should succession templates be put at the end of articles? I'm also not sure how to deal with things like the 2004 budget: is it still in the line of succession if it didn't pass? If you've got an idea of how to deal with these, please feel free to run with it. Vagary 19:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Was just an idea, might not be appropriate. heqs ·:. 08:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]