Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 July 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 20

[edit]
Image:E-Hemingway WorldWarIYoung.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Gieselle (notify | contribs).
  • Photoshopped version of an image we already have. It has been altered to remove a crease, thus destroying the historical accuracy of it. Futhermore, while converting the file to jpg, the uploader introduced many digital artifacts (speckling) that make this version inferior to the original. — -N 00:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep both this and the original. The crease removal doesn't destroys its historical accuracy anymore that the crease itself does. --Abu badali (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, delete it.

Image:Stella May.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Shippoluv (notify | contribs).
  • All of the uploader's other images were blatant copyvios. All of his other edits were to his user page, which I deleted as WP:CSD#U3. This one can be deleted unless he decides to contribute to the encyclopedia.- Chick Bowen 00:51, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: OR UE --Abu badali (talk) 13:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:PENIS_in_erection.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Vuksi (notify | contribs).
  • Neutral listing. This was nominated for speedy deletion as vandalism, but I don't think that's clear. It is the uploader's only listed contribution. It was also tagged IfD, but I didn't see it in the list, so I'm adding it without taking a position.  But|seriously|folks  04:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The labels give it a degree of educational value, but they are too small in thumbnail to be read. Therefor, I don't see enough added value over the pre-existing Image:Uncircumcised_Penis.jpg to bother keeping it.
Image:Zuleyka Rivera.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Kai20180 (notify | contribs).
Image:Foie_gras_broken_bill.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by FarmSanctuary (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned image. Uploader not notified because inactive for 5 months and had talkpage deleted (db-owner), so appears to be absentee. Admin can notify if it's really necessary. — --Icarus (Hi!) 06:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Foie_gras_1.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by FarmSanctuary (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned image. Uploader not notified because inactive for 5 months and had talkpage deleted (db-owner), so appears to be absentee. Admin can notify if it's really necessary. — --Icarus (Hi!) 06:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tokyo_Rainbow_Bridge.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Nakazima (notify | contribs).
Image:Jkal photo02.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Smkeithley (notify | contribs).


Image:Albionfabletlc.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by HighSimSim (notify | contribs).



Image:LittleChapelofFlowers.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Jdfoote (notify | contribs).
  • Tagged as PD but with a notice that use of the file is only permitted on Wikipedia. Image comes from a copyrighted website so probably is Copyright violation. Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 14:19, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]



Uploaded by MichaelR
Image:Corduff_oseighin.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Lapsed Pacifist (notify | contribs).
Image:NurPashiKulayev2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Sherurcij (notify | contribs).
Got a link saying it's from the CT? Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 17:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Umm, it's right on the image description page, which you added in this edit. And if it's not them, then the copyright holder is unknown. Hmmm... now that I look at it more closely, the one on the CT page is not the same angle as this photo, so this then becomes an image without a source and subject to speedy deletion instead. howcheng {chat} 17:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ultramagnusdeath.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Orbital (notify | contribs).
Image:Wowow03.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Homboy (notify | contribs).

DELETE. I agree that the image should be deleted.harlock_jds 17:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stampedeultra2.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by John earlm (notify | contribs).
Image:Tom_T._Hall.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by LovePatsyCline (notify | contribs).
Image:Barefoot by vshtevnin.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Nantesbenchpress (notify | contribs).
  • The image is originally in violation with CV, and photography theft as well. The original was located at this link: http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/51624016/ The uploader also claims to be the subject's mother within the photo, but the original entry with that gallery contradicts this as well. I request this image be deleted IMMEDIATELY. 18:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Hopmancup07russia.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by SportsAddicted (notify | contribs).
Image:MWR Matthew Rowan.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Matthewrowan (notify | contribs).
Image:CNV00009.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Joerichlaw (notify | contribs).



Image:Brimstone_VC.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Fall Of Darkness (notify | contribs).
Image:Bringing_Baby_Logo.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Bringingbaby (notify | contribs).
Image:British_Airways_777_SJO.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Radulov2010 (notify | contribs).
Image:San_pedro_morazan.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Olimpia10031 (notify | contribs).
Image:Olimpiateam.JPG (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Olimpia10031 (notify | contribs).
Image:Lebanese_Hezbollah_recruts_being_sworn_in.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Tickle me (notify | contribs).
  • image was taken by an AFP photographer and is taken from a stock photography agency (Getty Images) this directly violates policy by using a news agency photo in this manner Bleh999 21:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Stop this nonsense - it's not the first time Bleh999 is abusing images or img deletion templates. If it violates policy 'directly', Bleh999 will be able and willing to link to the corresponding 'policy'. Can he be bothered to have a go? This is the second attempt-of many to come-to have a politically unwelcome img deleted. Quite to the contrary, the fair use exigencies have been never met as accurately as in this case. --tickle me 01:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This photograph is not old enough and widely distributed enough to be considered particularly iconic, the way it's being used is to discuss the type of salute depicted rather than the photograph itself, this violates #2 of the non-free content policy, respect for commercial opportunities [4] Bleh999 01:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You perused WP:Non-free_content and slammed together some words and sub clauses. Fair use images don't have to be iconic, that's only one of many criteria. The pic is 6 years old, there's no definition that would make 6 years 'not old enough'.
> the way it's being used is to discuss the type of salute depicted rather than the photograph itself
Of course it is used to illustrate something, that's what fair use is all about - since when do we use a photograph to illustrate 'the photograph itself'? This doesn't make any sense. Stop abusing procedure. --tickle me 02:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So out of 4 articles it is being used in, only one actually mentions Hezbollah using any sort of salute Roman_salute, in the rest it is used for purely decorative purposes it appears since nothing beyond the caption adds any context to the article. Also the fair use rationale contains unsourced claims about German instructors teaching hezbollah how to salute after WWII yet none of the articles talk about this. A source for the single claim of hezbollah salute in Roman_salute reveals a New York Sun editorial used a very similar photo by Suhaila Sahmarani/AFP in August 2006, which is actually proof that this image is still commercially viable to the copyright owners. Bleh999 05:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're pushing new specious claims and bogus reasoning once the old claims have been disproved, without even bothering to look back - all while amassing protest for disruptive behavior elesewhere. This could go on forever. I want an admin to tell me whether I have to cope with this. --tickle me 23:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think making personal attacks strengthens your case, instead you could have tried to address of the concerns I raised, none of these claims specious or bogus. Wikipedia has a specific fair use policy and this image fails the test. Bleh999 23:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable image from a news agency, not used in a discussion about the image itself. Notable images have been discussed somewhere. Can anyone provide a link to some reliable source discussing this image? --Abu badali (talk) 13:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Tiger Hill.njd.jpg (delete|talk|history|logs) - uploaded by Guptadeepak (notify | contribs).
  • inaccurate image. Tiger hill is most likely located here [7]. Map showing BOTH locations. inaccurate area is in the center and the yellow square on the left is the most likely correct location [8]Preetikapoor0 22:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]