Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 28

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanization (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
All subpages of Template:Romanizations
Category:Romanization templates

None of these are used. No scope for use. No reason why the romanization can't just be written in the article. It is hard enough to insert Asian/Arabic characters for most users - no reason to require it in this way. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tutorial (Editing)/sandbox graphical timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template that doesn't seem to serve a purpose c y m r u . l a s s (talk me, stalk me) 22:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:22, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alternateunderconstruction (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Move to userspace, only used by one person. WOSlinker (talk) 21:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge with article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jon Kortajarena in Ad Campaigns (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per here.  Mbinebri  talk ← 21:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He is a model known to do a lot of ad campaigns it's hard to keep up and mention all of them in the article. The template makes it easier to look at his yearly work. I don't think this should be deleted.--Anen87 (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:27, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:River Viiperi in Ad Campaigns (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per here.  Mbinebri  talk ← 21:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RudyGiulianiSegments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Looks unnecessary. Needs to be fixed if it is going to be used. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rs S14 mid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unknown. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Userfy, redundant to {{splitspan}} Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rspan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lspan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. <span>s are inline HTML elements and should not be floated. If needed (which it shouldn't be, for that reason), just write the code. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Scots Dragoon Guards (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded - infobox at Royal Scots Dragoon Guards does the job nicely. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:50, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Scots (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded - infobox at Royal Scots takes care of this nicely. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per WP:T3 (should have been WP:G7). Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Palaces Hungary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

2 blue links. WP:NENAN. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created the template, and the deletion is actually ok with me. Gryffindor (talk) 16:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Marines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded - infobox at Royal Marines takes care of this nicely — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Royal Gurkha Rifles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Superseded - infobox at Royal Gurkha Rifles takes care of this nicely. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Routeboxca next (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. What have language names got to do with route boxes? Not necessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per WP:T3. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Round16ext no third (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Surely there is a duplicate of this that is actually used. If someone can find it, this template can be deleted. If there isn't one, that suggests this is not needed and can be deleted anyway. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Round16-3legs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Purpose unclear. Seems broken. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would gather to believe it is a modification of {{Round16}}, which is a highly practical template, but for which there are three matches per stage. I agree that it seems to be broken and unused, so I do not see why it should be around. Arsenikk (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Round16-LiverpoolSeniorCup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No scope for use, as there are no articles on the Liverpool Senior Cup other than the main article, and that article includes no tournament brackets. Not sure why this bizarre one with repechages is needed anyway. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rot90 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Rot270 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Okay, so this is a {{rot90|nice effect}} (if your browser supports it). But it's not totally supported, most likely bad for readability (it's annoying to turn your head 90 degrees to read the screen), and not currently used. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete You may think that it could be used for rotating long headings in tables and making the columns narower but as can be seen below, it's not that useful. Looks ok in IE but not on Firefox. -- WOSlinker (talk) 15:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Heading1 Rather Long Heading2 Rather Long Heading3
c1 c2 c3
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rosie Rushton (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be superseded by {{Rosie Rushton books}}. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:57, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Road designation Green (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Appears to have been created for use in Roads in Serbia, per the user's contributions, but it has been superseded by SVG graphics. Also delete the redirect. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:00, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:58, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rfc-open (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Five old substitutions. No longer used. No longer necessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC) — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete by Malik Shabazz as templates that misrepresent policy; also housekeeping given that they are sister templates to a long-deleted template. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rn2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Rn3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Rn4 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Very specific user-warning templates. Used twice, in 2005 and 2006, by the creator. {{rn2}} is rather too complex, in my opinion. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted by creator. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rfd speedy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used, not subst'ed (at least not as long as I have been traversing RfD). This is always done manually anyway; no benefit from using this non-specific (just says "Speedy") template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused sea of redlinks. No scope for use - all info is contained in the article Rio de Janeiro bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Don't really think any of these articles should be created, although some might be plausible for redirects. What is left is a navbox with a single article. If a small number of articles were created, they should be stuck into the main navbox for those games. Arsenikk (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 06:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Denali ImageMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Yellowstone ImageMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Yosemite ImageMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:NCascades ImageMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Nice images, and nice imagemaps. But, sad as I am to say so, I can't quite see the encyclopedic value of these unused templates. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Usage on a userpage doesn't really count, in my view. They can be userfied if that user wants them. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G8. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ringwood District Baseball League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used. Ringwood District Baseball League has been deleted. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge with Luo people of Kenya and Tanzania Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notable Joluo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Indiscriminate. Tries to join hockey players with politicians with rap artists based on a supposedly, but often unsourced, shared ethnicity. Maybe valuable as a cited list, but certainly not as a navbox. Resolute 01:30, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Airplaneman 01:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move to project space Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CSCOTW article (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:CSCOTW current (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The Computer science Collaboration of the Week doesn't seem to have been very well used. Initally created in Aug 2006 to one article and never changed. Suggest substituting into Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science/Collaboration of the Week and then deleting. WOSlinker (talk) 20:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Airplaneman 01:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the template is now redundant, and move and archive to a sub-page of WP:WPCS seems to be more appropriate than deletion. --Deryck C. 08:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted under WP:G7. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:02, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CRow navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Doesn't really offer anything that can't easily be accomplished with the standard {{Navbox}} template. WOSlinker (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.