Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 March 8. Primefac (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. There is a consensus to use Template:Cfd all instead of the module. Please make sure all existing functionality is kept intact before replacement and deletion. Primefac (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary Lua module, can be implemented in Wikitext. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:15, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Team is now defunct; roster template is no longer necessary — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pozzi.c (talkcontribs) 18:13, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per this discussion and related TfD. Primefac (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is a list of {{xx icon}} templates that remain following the conclusion of Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 10 § Link language wrappers with under 100 transclusions. The existence of these templates is apparently the reason that Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 February 4 § Template:Link language is stalled.

All of this is a followup to Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 June 9 § Link language wrappers where there was a consensus to remove usage of these wrappers but not for deletion. Monkbot/task 15 replaced almost all of the {{xx icon}} templates, their redirects, and {{link language}} and its redirects with {{in lang}}. Monkbot/task 15 continues to replace a handful of these templates daily. It is time to unstick the deletion process, delete these remaining {{xx icon}} templates, so that the {{link language}} tld can proceed, and then retire Monkbot/task 15.

Trappist the monk (talk) 18:03, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substitution. Primefac (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Practically unused set of templates (once in 2009). They should be substituted and deleted. –MJLTalk 14:35, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).