Jump to content

Ah Sin v. Wittman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ah Sin v. Wittman
Decided May 29, 1905
Full case nameAh Sin v. Wittman
Citations198 U.S. 500 (more)
Holding
To prove abuse of discretion in the enforcement of criminal law that violates the Equal Protection Clause, it is necessary to show that there were people of other races who committed the same crime without being prosecuted.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Melville Fuller
Associate Justices
John M. Harlan · David J. Brewer
Henry B. Brown · Edward D. White
Rufus W. Peckham · Joseph McKenna
Oliver W. Holmes Jr. · William R. Day
Case opinions
MajorityMcKenna
DissentPeckham

Ah Sin v. Wittman, 198 U.S. 500 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held To prove abuse of discretion in the enforcement of criminal law that violates the Equal Protection Clause, it is necessary to show that there were people of other races who committed the same crime without being prosecuted.[1][2] This case involved anti-Chinese sentiment at the turn of the 20th century. Justice Rufus W. Peckham dissented without writing an opinion.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Ah Sin v. Wittman, 198 U.S. 500 (1905)
  2. ^ Lieberman, Jethro K. (1999). "Prosecutorial Discretion". A Practical Companion to the Constitution. p. 393.
[edit]