Amadeo v. Zant
| Amadeo v. Zant | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided May 31, 1988 | |
| Full case name | Amadeo v. Zant |
| Citations | 486 U.S. 214 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A convicted person may use habeas corpus to challenge their conviction if they later learn that the prosecution racially discriminated in jury selection. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Marshall, joined by unanimous |
Amadeo v. Zant, 486 U.S. 214 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a convicted person may use habeas corpus to challenge their conviction if they later learn that the prosecution racially discriminated in jury selection.[1][2]
References
[edit]See also
[edit]External links
[edit] | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |