Category talk:Pilot intake jet fighter

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because ("Per nom" was the reason "Nose-mounted intake jet fighter" category has been deleted, because it used non technical terminology. ) --EncyclopedianWP (talk) 13:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Pilot intake" is by far a worse example of non-technical terminology. I'll also point out that the primary reason for the previous deletion nomination was that the category was a WP:TRIVIALCAT. If it were simply misnamed but otherwise useful, it would have been moved rather than deleted. - ZLEA _T\^C 13:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Pilot intake" is pure gibberish in this context. The only possible usage for this phrase within aviation concerns 'intake' of potential pilots for training: see e.g. this Reddit thread. [1]. The phrase has absolutely nothing to do with the shape or position of any inlet on an aircraft. I would strongly advise the category creator to leave category creation to people who are familiar with aviation terminology, and with Wikipedia criteria regarding appropriate categorisation. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]