Garland v. Ming Dai
| Garland v. Ming Dai | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided June 1, 2021 | |
| Full case name | Garland v. Ming Dai |
| Citations | 593 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| The Ninth Circuit's rule that a reviewing court "must treat a noncitizen's testimony as credible and true absent an explicit adverse credibility determination" violated the Immigration and Nationality Act. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Gorsuch, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Immigration and Nationality Act | |
Garland v. Ming Dai, 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Ninth Circuit violated the Immigration and Nationality Act with its rule that a reviewing court "must treat a noncitizen's testimony as credible and true absent an explicit adverse credibility determination."[1] When an immigration court rejects a noncitizen's testimony, the Act requires reviewing courts to uphold that rejection if there is any contrary evidence which a reasonable factfinder could have found sufficient to justify the rejection. As long as the rejection was not completely arbitrary, the rejection must stand.[2]
References
[edit]External links
[edit] | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |