@Jalapeño please let me know when you will have time to work on this article; otherwise, I will have to close the review as unsuccessful in the next few days. If you need a delay, that's fine, it's easy to put it on hold for a week. Thanks! —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
The house originally owned by Vice Stjepović-Skočibuha is still intact, and is centrally located in Suđurađ
This sentence needs a citation.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
For Glamuzina and Glamuzina, "Problematics" would probably be better translated as "Issues" or "Challenges".
TLDR History is certainly not a reliable source and should be removed.
What does "Pseudo-Caesar" mean for the author? The citation can be improved to be clearer about author and translator.
What makes dubrovackidnevnik.net a reliable source?
Directly run by RTL Hrvatska, created by the RTL Group and owned by it until 2022.
Sounds fine.
Please add authors and publication dates to the citations where available.
For the Gazette source, how do we know that Zupana = Sipan? Is this original research? The citation can also be improved by adding the publication date, page #, etc.
Cite #11 (Vice) should be improved to give the website name and source (Project Lazareti)
Cite #12 (Southeastern Europe) needs a page number, author, ISBN, publisher, etc.
Cite #13 (Zaboravljeni) needs an author, publisher, website name, date, etc.
There are similar issues of missing information for almost all the remaining citations, #s 14 through 24 at the moment. Please improve these so they are as complete as possible.
What makes #16 (direct-croatia.com) a reliable source?
Goravica.com just seems to be a random business' website. I'm not convinced it's reliable.
Casamundo.co.uk is almost certainly not a reliable source.
What makes total-croatia-news a reliable source?
From their about page: It is a Google News-accredited site which is followed by a lot of the international media. We were delighted to bring the New York Times to Hvar in Summer 2017, as well as to be recommended by both The Guardian and The Sunday Times. In August 2017, leading Croatian daily, Jutarnji List, called TCN ‘the world’s most reliable information for Croatian destinations.’
I'm not convinced that turistickeprice is a reliable source.
In general, the heavy reliance on tourist + booking sites is not at a GA standard. These sites are trying to sell people on something and some of them are essentially just blogs or clearly written as PR. More scholarly books and reliable news articles are needed.
Earwig suggests that this is a borrowed phrase There are two ports on the island, Suđurađ () in the east, and Šipanska Luka () in the west. I agree and it should be modified asap.
Fixed.
There's one other apparently borrowed phrase surround a dolomite depression but on inspection I think the source borrowed from Wiki rather than vice versa. However I do therefore recommend removing Source #7 (https://www.hrvaska.net/en/destinations/island-sipan.htm) and finding an alternative to avoid circular reporting / citogenesis.
I've changed this phrase as well.
Issues above addressed, hold for spot-check at end.
