This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose for now. One of the criteria of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is that it is much more likely than any other topic. The New Zealand politician has less than double the page views of the footballer: 7457 [1] vs. 4848 [2] over the last 90 days. A ratio of less than 2:1 can't be deemed primary topic, though it's not unlikely that will change in the future. Zarcadia (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support, per the links given by Zarcadia. The views for this article over the last 90 days are now over 11,000, while those for the footballer haven't changed significantly. My support is only weak because I accept that more time to establish longer term trends in article views would be better.-gadfium22:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support, per the same reason as gadfium. Little was only elected last Tuesday so it's still early days, but I've no doubt this article will become the primary topic. This is Paul (talk) 23:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I wanted to avoid confusion by using the old username (just so when you followed the link, you would see that name there), rather than the new one. But what I had overlooked is that this user has already commented on this under his new username. Very confusing; please accept my apologies. Schwede6605:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd forgotten about my comments there, but yes, this guy is leader of an official opposition and is likely to be the top Andrew Little mentioned in media, as well as viewed here. This is Paul (talk) 16:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
In this edit, I reformatted the infobox and added Minister for Pike River Re-entry which was missing. Most of the entries were in a successor1, successor2 etc line by line format, but several were block entries for each position held. I thought that the line by line version was easier to navigate and easier to delete or add entries without disturbing the numbering, but won't fight over a revert so long as the reverter makes sure the Pike River entry is kept. Akld guy (talk) 01:34, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]