Jump to content

Talk:Art and morality

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs further discussion on the arguments made by both sides. The article works well because it documents the many times when the ethics of art has been brought up by the public. It is relevant. However, the article is brief and fails to explain why people hold 'Platonist' or Aestheticists points of view. There is much to be found on this topic. One of which is Kieran's Art, Morality and Ethics: On the (Im)Moral Character of Art Works and Inter-Relations to Artistic Value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.206.211 (talk) 11:57, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Art and morality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]