Jump to content

Talk:Arthur Morris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleArthur Morris is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 19, 2016.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 26, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
January 6, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on August 22, 2015.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 19, 2022, and January 19, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

Good article nomination on hold

[edit]

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of July 18, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Very much so, a comprehensive and verbose account. However, the lead is three times longer than some leads in featured articles, while only two paragraphs, they're overly detailed and I think they need to be trimmed down quite a bit.
2. Factually accurate?: Perry, Benaud, Wisden? Yep.
3. Broad in coverage?: Indeed.
4. Neutral point of view?: Very much so.
5. Article stability? No reason to doubt the stability of the article whatsoever.
6. Images?: All fine.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved and please let me know if you'd like me to review again when the various changes have been made. The Rambling Man 18:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've pruned the lead by about 10%. Hopefully the lead isn't too much of a big deal. Many FAs have leads of a similar and somewhat large size. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's not a big deal, it was just something that stood out, and you've pruned it sufficiently I think. It's a good basis for a WP:FA to be honest, so promoting it now to WP:GA is no big deal either! The Rambling Man 08:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Arthur Morris

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Arthur Morris's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "report4":

  • From Ian Johnson with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948: ">"Fourth Test Match England v Australia". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. Wisden. 1949. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
  • From Sam Loxton with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948: "Fourth Test Match England v Australia". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. Wisden. 1949. Retrieved 2008-07-02.
  • From 1948 Ashes series: "Fourth Test Match ENGLAND v AUSTRALIA". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. Wisden. 1949. Retrieved 2008-07-02.

Reference named "sco2":

Reference named "report2":

Reference named "sched":

Reference named "o":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 06:09, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Career

[edit]

Morris played for the International Touring teams in 1962-64 totalling 4 fc matches A Tillmann —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.168.184.115 (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test Broadcast

[edit]

Is it worth mentioning that Arthur Morris's last over in the 1953 series was used for many years by the BBC as a TV test broadcast? Probably means that Arthur Morris has bolwed more balls on British TV than anyone else.... I'll see if I can find a reference.WillE (talk) 22:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, but seems a bit trivial to me. --Dweller (talk) 16:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Arthur Morris/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Still needs references fixes and in places some more of them, but has the needed prose and structure is there for a GA. Per the Assessment table. Daniel 08:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 08:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arthur Morris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]