Jump to content

Talk:Banerjee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Serious attention is required for improvement of quality standard of this article. Vandalism is evident in some sections as well. Ritwikbmca (talk) 07:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING !!

[edit]

subjects need to have wikipedia articles about them to be considered notable here Ritwikbmca (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Ghosh - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 12:20, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mukherjee which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2021

[edit]
24.220.25.50 (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it should be from West Bengal,India in the history section 24.220.25.50 (talk) 06:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, No it should not. You are asking to modify reference quotation that needs to be reproduced in the article as it is as per policy. See the reference page 94. It clearly says

Banerjee (485) Indian (Bengal) and Bangladeshi: Hindu (Brahman) name, the first element of which, Ban....

Also Banerjees are not restricted to West Bengal, they can come from eastern Bengal (modern Bangladesh). - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Edit

[edit]

My edit was intended as copyediting without change to the sense of the article. Currently this is in broken English and the list of names is disorganized and inconsistent in punctuation. It will repel native English-speakers. I won't touch it again given the revert and given this topic is low-priority for me. RowanElder (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I partially restored your changes, as I agree that the "lineage" wording in your version is easier to read. I did not restore your changes to the lede, as they seemed unnecessary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it wasn't necessary. I find "Bengali from Bengal" awkward but it is a matter of taste. RowanElder (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]