Talk:Basahan

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 August 2024. The result of the discussion was merge.

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 May 2020 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

improve

Sir Ringer, irvin, Kunokuno. Maybe you can help to improve this article? -- ᜰᜲᜫᜲᜨ᜴ ᜢᜩᜲᜰᜳᜧ᜴ (Talk) 12:16, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This should be subsumed to baybayin

Isn't making a separate page for this rather pedantic? This is just a regional variant of Baybayin. Rajavlitra23 (talk) 07:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basahan is inlisted in the Vocabularyo de la legua bikol of Marcos de Lisboa, Maybe we did´nt subsumed --Shimin_Ufesoj (🦜) 11:54, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- From what I see here, the letter shapes are generally identical to Baybayin. The Visyan Badlit script diverges a bit more, but still redirects to the main Baybayin article. Unless you want to give Badlit its own article like Kulitan did, I'm not sure what this article even brings to the table. Rajavlitra23 (talk) 12:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first sentence of the article says it is a synonym of baybayin! Merge any distinct content, and redirect. —Tamfang (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ShiminUfesoj. this does not seem like moving forward with merging this article with Baybayin. You haven't given any reason why the two shouldn't be merged, so I don't want you to have anything go missing because someone else has to move over the content on your behalf. It is not acceptable to have two different articles covering exactly the same subject, and this is quite honestly the most obvious case of that I've ever seen, unless there's some explanation.Remsense ‥ 论 21:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]