This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
I've done some comparing and I think the aircraft involved in the movie: Madagascar might be the Beechcraft 18 in the article. should it be included in the article? Or should I do more research, or is it not important enough to include? because the plane in the movie could just be a "generic World War II aircraft." Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 20:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:AIRPOP, aircraft appearing in fictional media should be added to the aircraft in fiction article, not the article about the aircraft itself. However, the aircraft's identity and role should be properly sourced and cited, which is probably an insurmountable order for a very cartoonish animated film starring talking anthropomorphic animals. Someone directly involved in creating the film would probably need to have gone on the record saying that it's deliberately modeled after a Beech 18. (Incidentally, the film's online fan community seems to think it's a Lockheed Model 14 Super Electra, noting the unique empennage, its overall size, and the number of side windows.) Carguychris (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I had thought about the Electras, and they might be a better contender, but I don't think I have the will or the power to try to find and ask anyone involved. It could be a 'reference' to Amelia Earhart's model 10, but the (passengers), location and size/looks of the plane doesn't make that idea very viable. Cheers tho <3 Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 16:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
