Jump to content

Talk:Characters of the Kirby series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Characters

[edit]

I wanted to add the characters introduced in Star Allies and Forgotten Land to the article, but it seems that only characters that appear in multiple games and are therefore recurring characters are allowed. I wanted to know if this is the case before I add them. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:F569:3AFE:8CFF:CEAA (talk) 14:59, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is currently the case. The character needs to have made at least 3 major appearances in games in the series. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:70DC:BC7:3C72:F6E9 (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect The Three Mage-Sisters has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 8 § The Three Mage-Sisters until a consensus is reached. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King Dedede article?

[edit]

Hi. I would like to leave this message to remind everyone that King Dedede should deserve his own article. He used to have an article back then but got deleted/merged due to notability problems in the past. But times have changed, and I definitely think that King Dedede should have his own article again. He is the 2nd most popular Kirby character only behind Kirby. I also think that they're are plenty of reliable sources for him nowadays since he is popular and well-known. I hope this would appeal. Thank You. 50.100.46.100 (talk) 02:04, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most of your argument is based on "I think." None of that really works here. The AFD for the King Dedede closed less than a year ago and there haven't been any major Kirby games released since that would spark "plenty of reliable sources for him nowadays." In other words, if it was a problem less than a year ago, it's likely still a problem. So no, this is not a strong case to recreate the article. ThomasO1989 (talk) 04:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]