Jump to content

Talk:Cheek v. United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Redirects needed

Cheek v. U.S. Cheek v. US 498 U.S. 192 498 US 192

Two separate holdings

[edit]

I have elaborated on the holdings in this case in the article. The Court made a very distinct differentiation between arguments about constitutionality and all other arguments, resulting in two separate holdings. Yours, Famspear 22:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scalia's concurring opinion?

[edit]

Perhaps someone with more credibility on this site than myself would be willing to add a section discussing Justice Scalia's concerns mentioned in his concurring opinion. He agreed with the holding, but disagreed rather strongly about the disallowance of the constitutionality arguments.