Jump to content

Talk:Club Feathers/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Danielyng (talk · contribs) 20:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


I am notifying you of my intentions to start reviewing this Article for Good Article status. Expect a full review to be out in a week at most, probably either tomorrow or Friday. Danielyng (talk) 20:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC) @Danielyng:[reply]

Hi, and thanks for taking on this review! Armadillopteryx 20:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Jurysith: Do you still intend to review this article? Armadillopteryx 02:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Armadillopteryx, since Daniel seems to be inactive in GARring, I'll take over his position for a portion. He will have to be, though, the one closing it; I'll simply help this be leveled with a GA. GeraldWL 17:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerald Waldo Luis: Nice to see you here! Thanks for reviewing. Armadillopteryx 21:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Description

[edit]

History

[edit]

GWL GAProgress box

[edit]

For me, this has passed GA. At least IMO-- the formal reviewer is Daniel and thus he must be the one determining and closing. I would hope for at least one image depicting the restaurant in distant future. GeraldWL 16:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
Gerald Waldo Luis, thank you for the review! Jurysith, are you willing to close this review? Do you have any additional comments? Armadillopteryx 17:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Armadillopteryx, Sidenote: this is the same case in Talk:Fuller's Coffee Shop/GA1. I think if Daniel does not respond in significantly long period, there should be a second reviewer pass. GeraldWL 17:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerald Waldo Luis: Agreed. I'm watching both pages. Armadillopteryx 17:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
+1 ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked if there's a place to request a review close, since we're not getting any replies from the editor who opened the review page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:06, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have just posted a note on Jurysith's talk page, giving them until the end of 2020 to either continue the review or post here that they won't be doing so. At that point, another reviewer (Gerald Waldo Luis?) should feel free to take over and continue/conclude the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BlueMoonset, [smiles sinisterly] Is for me?
Then sure, this article's  Passed. GeraldWL 17:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Um, Gerald Waldo Luis, it is still 2020. Please do wait until the end of 2020 to do the final determination, aka the beginning of 2021. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:50, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]