Talk:Competition (economics)

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 December 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Competition (economics) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Capitalism Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Capitalism, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CapitalismWikipedia:WikiProject CapitalismTemplate:WikiProject CapitalismCapitalism articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Edit this?

Is this correct in the 6th line: "concluding that with the no system of resource"? 69.228.84.242 (talk) 05:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted a couple of sentences in Competitive equilibrium, because the reference to Palgrave's Dictionary of Economics was wrong, and the reference to investopedia made a much too narrow point. It was quite messy. Now, the section only refers to investopedia, i.e. secondary literature, and that is not good enough: An encyclopedia that refers to another encyclopedia ... etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjerke (talk • contribs) 09:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Captive Audiance

Can captive audience be described as a Seller's Market? ----MountVic127 (talk) 04:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

History of Competition section is actually history of US competitiveness

Hi I'm just a casual reader of Wikipedia doing some research, but this section seemed extremely strange to me.

While it's great that there's writing on Wikipedia about the history of US competitiveness, this seems like the totally wrong place for it (you can't have a section for every country's individual history), or at the very least it has the wrong title.

Personally I came to this section of the page to learn about national competition in general and having a massive chunk of US history in the middle was totally useless to me; I imagine it's the same for anyone else who isn't specifically interested in the US.

If someone could consider moving, renaming, or changing this section, that would be great. Thanks! 92.232.72.16 (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Buyer's market" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Buyer's market has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 23 § Buyer's market until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Competitiveness" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Competitiveness has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 24 § Competitiveness until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]