Talk:DBc

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article should be titled "dBc", not "DBc" Greg 14:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arguments against proposed merger

I found the article on dBm to be very useful, with some extension the dBc article could be equally useful.
I would say there is a clear distinction between the unit dBc and the phenomenon of phase noise.
Given the lack of information in the phase noise article, I would say there isn't even short-term benefit to the merger.DJIndica 22:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see no point in merging this into phase noise. dBc is not only used when talking about phase noise. It's a generic unit. Romanski 11:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Although the decibel (dB) is permitted for use alongside SI units, the dBc is not.".

Can someone add a "Instead, use XXXX" suffix?