Jump to content

Talk:Damon Keith

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 02:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Senators don't nominate federal judges. If he took office in 1967, he was nominated by LBJ. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.247.226.101 (talk) 08:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-created subpage

[edit]

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Damon Jerome Keith was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 02:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Damon Keith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damon Keith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Damon Keith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Damon Keith. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Service dates

[edit]

How was it that he was a judge of E.D. Mich. and 6th Cir. simultaneously for a month? MrArticleOne (talk) 23:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @MrArticleOne: Keith's term as a Judge of the Court of Appeals began when he received his commission (appointment) from the President. However, he did NOT take the oath of office immediately for the Court of Appeals, instead preferring to stay on the District Court for one more month, perhaps to close out pending trials he was presiding over. When he finally did take the oath of office for the Court of Appeals, he began his service on that court and his service and his term on the District Court ended on that day. So, as you can see, it is quite possible for terms to overlap on two different courts, though service can never overlap. Safiel (talk) 06:01, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting. My sense, for what it's worth, is that the dates should run from when the individual actually took office. For example, technically George Washington's term as President began on Mar. 4, 1789, but no almanac in the world would list that as a relevant date for his time as President. He took the oath on Apr. 30, and that's the date that sources always give. MrArticleOne (talk) 21:57, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @MrArticleOne: We have had some back and forth discussion on previous occasions as it refers to Supreme Court Justices. The issue is not fully settled. In a practical sense, however, I would prefer to use commission date in the infobox, since that date is universally available at FJC Bio, while the oath date for many Judges is not known, not easily available and in the cases of many earlier Judges, has been lost due to destruction of records by fire. I am open to modifying the Infobox officeholder template to allow for the inclusion separately of the oath date, if available. But, again, it is a matter that is not fully settled by the Wikipedia community, still open to discussion. Safiel (talk) 17:27, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's fair, and I readily concede I am not invested in the ongoing discussion on the subject. Just my 2¢. MrArticleOne (talk) 23:51, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]