Jump to content

Talk:Denise van Outen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Denise also hosted a show called "something for the weekend" from 2000- 2001 where she famouslly said to a guest "Come on, make room for a mushroom" and sidled in beside her. the show was based on sexual antics!

It was in 1999, and is now in this article. Jim Michael (talk) 20:46, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems a lot of information has been deleted from her page, is it her management? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:5215:5400:DE3:1C82:9F71:E0D5 (talk) 12:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In a relationship with James Lance

[edit]

Source? This must be very recent. I only say this because it was stated that she was single on the 28th April episode of Any Dream Will Do.

I would add that Denise co-stared in Andy Williams in the music video CAN'T TAKE MY EYES OFF OF YOU. Mlurawiki 17:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

van or Van?

[edit]

The article currently uses both. She is English, not Dutch. Varlaam (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life section WP:BLP

[edit]

To follow Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons guidlines the 'Personal life' section requires better sourcing than is provided for certain assertions. The content is out of line with WP:NOTSCANDAL "Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy." A Newspaper gossip piece and court reports containing other peoples' assertions about the subject are not sufficient for stating those assertions as fact in Wikipedia's voice. The subject of the allegation would need to be the source to have this kind of thing in the article.Overagainst (talk) 16:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

7 years

[edit]

Denise is seven years older than Lee Mead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.1.208 (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Glitter relationship

[edit]

It can be seen that going through the history of the article reference to van Outen's relationship with Gary Glitter has been frequently removed and reinserted on a later date. Currently it is absent.

e.g. here it has been inserted on the 29th August 2009 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denise_van_Outen&oldid=310696317 but two days later on 1st September 2009 the information has been removed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denise_van_Outen&oldid=311307800 Yet the information is correct as seen on the correctly referenced BBC news webpage http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/510582.stm which states "Glitter had relationship with Denise Van Outen, then aged 17"

Another example of this happening; it was present on 21:33, 15 March 2012‎ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denise_van_Outen&oldid=482092877#Personal_life and then removed on 16:55, 13 April 2012 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Denise_van_Outen&oldid=487200205#Personal_life‎ !!

I suggest the information is put back into the article. "In 1991, aged 17, she had a relationship with shamed popstar Gary Glitter" — Preceding unsigned comment added by NatterJames (talkcontribs) 18:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point, but would suggest that claims this controversial really need excellent sourcing before inclusion in a BLP. The BBC article mentions it almost as an aside in a claim by one person. Is there any better or multiple sources that specifically covers this? --Escape Orbit (Talk) 12:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps trying to stress that the relationship was a friendship is more helpful. On the Daily Mail site she claims to have been just friends with Gary Glitter "More damagingly still, he claimed she left him to have an affair with Gary Glitter - an allegation she has denied, although she admits they were friends." http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-177909/A-brighter-future-Denise.html) Stating the admitted friendship and avoiding the ambiguous word "relationship" would surely not be controversial and were it to be untrue the newspapers would have had to have corrected it by now. NatterJames (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Denise van Outen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]