Talk:Dinosaur Diorama
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
If someone could upload the logo, I'd be much obliged.Ebness86 (talk) 00:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Do you have any sources to prove the subject's notability? Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 00:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I added links for the notability requirement, my citations aren't turning out properly. You should be able to see the URL in the edit article page.Ebness86 (talk)
- I checked the links, and neither one of them mentions "Dinosaur Diorama" anywhere on the page, so those probably won't qualify. And for future reference, you need to add a reference section by placing {{reflist}} under a ===References=== header Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 00:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
They do, however, mention shows created by Dinosaur Diorama - The Burg and The All-for-Nots, and the creators. But I see your point. I'll look for more concrete articles. Here's a Variety article that mentions them in conjunction with Michael Eisner's distribution company Vuguru: http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117967708.html?categoryId=14&cs=1Ebness86 (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well, maybe there should be articles about the shows, but there just doesn't seem to be enough content to justify an article about the company. Also, consult WP:COMPANY and WP:WEB for more information on the notability of these articles. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 00:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm new here, so I bow to your superior knowledge of these matters. I just noticed that Big Fantastic had a page and an equally notable web production company didn't.Ebness86 (talk) 00:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- To be entirely honest, I'm not sure about that page's notability, either. I'll be sure to look into it. And by no means am I infallable on these matters, I only nominated the page. It's up to an administrator to make the final call. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 00:51, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
This is more a media or production company related stub than it is a World Wide Web related stub. I'd recommend changing the tag at the bottom of the article.Ebness86 (talk) 22:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)