Jump to content

Talk:Doug Clark (serial killer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Book

[edit]

The book talking with serial killers presents fairly credible evidence as to the controversial nature of Clark's conviction and the nature of the murders. It seems one sided to only include the current narrative when christopher berry-dee presents a very credible and seemingly thoroughly researched alternative that indicates that douglas clark, despite being thoroughly reprehensible in other ways, was an accessory to murder rather than a serial killer. It seems wrong to not include this contention in the article, or at least to mention the existence of the disagreement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.243.189.227 (talk) 22:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a link to the source you mention? It may be worth including if it can be agreed upon as reliable. Roberticus talk 21:31, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure Berry-Dee is a good source. He has essentially no web presence, doesn't have his own entry in Wikipedia, and appears to have no real qualifications in law or criminology. He's just described as a former Royal Marine. 70.181.54.106 (talk) 12:51, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Doug Clark (criminal)Doug ClarkPrimary topic. 4,133, 204. Partial title matches (Douglas): 184, 111, 62. Marcus Qwertyus 08:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Date of birth

[edit]

The date of birth under his photo is not the same as the date in the article (September 25, 1948 vs. March 10 1948). I don't know which date is correct.2601:14D:4000:2150:5563:911A:7038:18F5 (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]