Jump to content

Talk:Eastern Avenue station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Eastern Avenue station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 18:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I'll be taking this one. eviolite (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Comments:

  • Where is "Urban Ring Phase 2 FACT SHEET" from, and why is it an RS? I understand it is used only to cite a general description of the project, so not a big deal.
    •  Done It's from a Massachusetts state agency - I've added that to the citation.
  • Could the connection to the MBTA bus and the adjoining stations (as shown in the infobox) be also mentioned and referenced in the station layout section?
    •  Partly done I mentioned and cited the local bus. The adjacent stations are generally treated as a navigation aid; unless there's a particular relation with one of the stations (such as being extremely close, or one a replacement for the other, etc), they don't need to be discussed in the prose.
  • Link Everett, Massachusetts
    •  Done
  • Link Right-of-way (transportation) to avoid confusion with the common legal definition
    •  Done
  • Consider linking South Boston
    •  Done
  • Link Bellingham Square (or maybe Bellingham Square station? unsure)
    •  Done

It was a nice read overall, well written, with few issues (mostly minor nitpicks with links) - putting on hold for now. Thanks, eviolite (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Eviolite: Thanks for the review! I believe I've addressed all your comments. (BTW, if you're interested in more GA reviews, I've nominated three other articles that share a lot of history with this one: Box District station, Bellingham Square station, and Chelsea station (MBTA). I've already made the same copyedits to those three. No pressure, of course!) Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Happy to promote this to GA given those edits. (And I'll see if I can look at those other noms later, but right now I'm trying to review one nomination from each GA topic.) Great work. eviolite (talk) 03:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]