Jump to content

Talk:Fairview Township, Erie County, Pennsylvania

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

The image Image:Erie county flag.SVG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --13:23, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fairview Township, Erie County, Pennsylvania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Fairview Township

[edit]

Feel this one sentence article would be better if merged into Faiview Township. It seems like something that should be mentioned in the township history section. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​talkcontribs 00:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If they waited two years then it would be an okay aricle. Plus, I added some. ''[[User:Kitia|Kitia'']] 18:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If "who" waited two years? I assume the people of Fairview. Still Fairview is only a township and would be better if this article was redirected to the township and the fact that Fairview was a distinct community until recently and should mentioned in the township article. You are welcome to convince me otherwise by finding the community website (not the township's) and also who is in charge of the actual "community" of Fairview. Also addresses and phone numbers are technically not allowed (see WP:NOT#DIR). --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​talkcontribs 20:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are completely missing the point- if the people of the Borough of Fairview waited two years to dissolve the municipality they wouldhave been covered by the Census 2000, which the RamBot found and uploaded to Wikipedia a while ago. Point two: Fairview is still a distinct community, it is just not a distinct municipality (there is a difference). Point three: Fairview is goverend by Fairview Township, and the township website has the information on the former borough. See also: Washington Boro, Pennsylvania, another former borough that got dissolved into another township. ''[[User:Kitia|Kitia'']] 20:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. Also try to not duplicate any info from the township, to the borough page. Unless its historical and/or pretains to the borough before being dissolved. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​talkcontribs 20:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poorwayfaringstranger (talkcontribs) [reply]