Jump to content

Talk:Felixstowe Porte Baby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Name

[edit]

The type appears to have been known as the Porte F.B.2 and later acquired the name Porte F.B.2 Baby as far as I can see it was never known as as the Felixstowe Porte Baby at the time. It was a pre-requisite of the Felixstowe family which started with the F.1. Should we rename the article? MilborneOne (talk) 14:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think CommonName might be appropriate even if contemporaneously it was known as something else. What do the modern sources call it - as the article title, just 'Porte Baby', something else entirely? GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Porte Baby appears to be the common name at the time. Modern sources may just copy Wikipedia! MilborneOne (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) Peter London's British Flying Boats (2003) calls it the Porte Baby, sometimes with 'Baby' in quotes. Thetford's British Naval Aircraft since 1912 (1978) calls it the Porte Baby. Jack Bruce's article in Flight (1954) generally calls it the Porte Baby, although noting that it was officially designated F.B.2.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Felixstowe Porte Baby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]