Talk:George Webster (presenter)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Launchballer (talk · contribs) 12:57, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 21:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I will review this soon. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
|
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Prose is good. I have no complaints here. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Lead looks good. No concerns. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
|
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | See comments below. Otherwise, I checked about half the sources and found no issues. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
2c. it contains no original research. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
7. Overall assessment. | Great work. I have no complaints here and I'm going to go ahead and pass this article. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:35, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
- a condition caused by an extra copy of chromosome 21 A news article isn't really an appropriate source for a medical claim. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:24, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Cut; it's in the condition's article anyway.--Launchballer 22:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:30, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Cut; it's in the condition's article anyway.--Launchballer 22:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.