Jump to content

Talk:Get to Heaven

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGet to Heaven has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 26, 2017Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 24, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Everything Everything's third album, Get to Heaven, was at one point bookmakers' favourite for the 2015 Mercury Prize, but was ultimately not even nominated?
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Get to Heaven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Get to Heaven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Get to Heaven/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tbhotch (talk · contribs) 04:03, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Hi Tbhotch, thanks so much for beginning this review. It's late here, but I wanted to pick off some of the "easy" things tonight. I'll get to some of the more complex things tomorrow. :) — fox 08:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Tbhotch
;General
Infobox
Lead
Recording and production
  • second album Arc. -> second album Arc (2013).
  • This is done in any kind of articles (not only musical ones), in and outside Wikipedia. You have to give context to readers as they not necessarily know everything you are talking about (you have to give context). You also have to consider readers not always click on the links (because they don't want to or they cannot do it), or that these articles can be printed, be part of the CD/DVD selection, or be part of the Wikipedia's board game, so that additional context is excluded. If you don't want to use "(year)", you can say it on text, ("released in 2000", "2000's"), etc.© Tbhotch (en-2.5). 18:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Pritchard told Skiddle" and "During recording sessions" paragraphs are too short.
  • There is no official guideline for WP:Paragraphs other than that link, and if you Google the rules there are no definitive rules for the length. However, it is suggested to have coherence when building a paragraph and they have to remain focused in one idea. In this section you have 5 paragraphs: Paragraph 1 gives the background of Get to Heaven; Paragraph 2 still about the background, but discusses why it was recorded; Paragraph 3 is about what Paragraph 2 is talking about; Paragraph 4 is about the record production; Paragraph 5 is about Higgs "depression". So after this revision, Paragraph 3 is the one that has to be merged with Paragraph 2. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 18:26, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Composition
  • Okay, I folded it into the previous paragraph; this subsection talks about lyrics and not the music, so it wouldn't fit into the same para as the musical influences. — fox 23:28, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Promotion and release
Charts
  • Remove ""X" denotes song not released in a particular country." and ""=" denotes track not eligible for a particular chart.", you aren't using them.
Critical reception
Commercial performance
  • "Get to Heaven entered the UK Albums Chart at number seven.[61][62]" That's it?
  • There isn't much more information available about the commercial success of the album; I can dig for more tomorrow, or just fold this section into the previous one. — fox 08:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Track listing
  • "A gatefold vinyl edition of the album was distributed in the UK by RCA Records, featuring the same track listing as the standard edition of the album." is unsourced.
  • Who is/are the writer(s)?
References
Lead
  • The lead is too short and it currently looks unorganized (Recorded -> release -> charts -> singles -> composition -> reception).
Recording and production
Composition
  • Indie pop art pop are mentioned in the infobox, but not here, why?
References
Categories

Sorry for the late answer, it has been an awful week here. One last thing I didn't notice at first @Fox:, if you are going to use WP:ALTTEXT all images require it for consistency. Other than that, I see no other problem. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 19:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch: That is totally fine, I absolutely understand! I will add this to the other images now. Thanks again for your detailed review! — fox 20:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Fox: Passing the nomination. You can also consider the Wikipedia:Did you know process for it. Good work. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 21:07, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]