Talk:GreatNonprofits

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved for you. No discussion needed. Hill Crest's WikiLaser (Boom.) (talk) 23:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great Nonprofits → GreatNonprofits – I am an Intern for GreatNonprofits. As a branding issue, we want to change the title to "GreatNonprofits" from "Great Nonprofits." GreatNP (talk) 16:47, 16 August 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Notability concern

I'm raising the notability tag, because the sources now listed for it don't have more than four sentences about the group. That isn't nearly enough to get it by WP:NCORP. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed the article for deletion. Vectro (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm avoiding editing articles at this point, but will note that the edits by @LeoNev: did not satisfy the notability concerns despite his deleting the notability tag; the sources added were a bunch of databases, and databases do not add to notability. Someone ought restore the tag. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:56, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing a bit more now... and have re-raised the notability flag on this. I don't have access to the Economist source, but the other sources have a handful of sentences on the topic, not enough to establish notability. The press page that is pointed to has nothing since 2016, and a quick look at things prior does not impress. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 04:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]