Talk:Heiningen
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Heiningen (Landkreis Göppingen) from de.wikipedia. |
Requested move 9 October 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Heiningen be renamed and moved to Heiningen, Baden-Württemberg. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Heiningen → Heiningen, Baden-Württemberg – Per page views, it seems rather unclear how to distinguish a primary topic between the current de facto primary topic and Heiningen, Lower Saxony. For this reason, the current de facto primary topic should be displaced and the former title replaced with a disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Waqar💬 19:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support, create DAB at base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:16, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Town against small village. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:29, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- "
Town against small village
" doesn't seem to be a reason to prefer one over the other if neither one of them are inherently notable to readers of English, which is the audience this Wikipedia caters to. Otherwise, there doesn't seem to be any evidence yet presented to designate a primary topic here. Steel1943 (talk) 14:47, 12 October 2024 (UTC)- Being “inherently notable to readers of English” is the basic threshold to meet for being an article on the English WP and is therefore a presumed given for both articles. It has nothing to do with determining PT. Being more or less notable is not a criteria to consider. The only relevant criteria are 1) relative likelihood of being sought, and 2) historical significance. —-В²C ☎ 21:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- "
- Oppose Page views and populations (5000 vs 300) demonstrate PT by usage as well as by historical significance. Remember that it’s easier to clear the usage criteria hurdle when there is only one other topic that uses the name in question. —В²C ☎ 21:21, 16 October 2024 (UTC)