Jump to content

Talk:Kenji Ito/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

No complaints about this article. There are a few spots where the prose might need tightening but it still sounds fine, and is a very solid, informative read. All in all I enjoyed the article, and wish more people took a look at this stuff (especially since FFL2's "Save the World" is a much beloved piece, if overshadowed by other works).--Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]