Talk:Lackawanna Cut-Off

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2024/June;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in New York City Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

New Jersey Mid‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Lackawanna Cut-Off.

Merger discussion

The Waltz & Reece Cut, Armstrong Cut, Bradbury Fill, Colby Cut, Jones Cut, Vail Fill, Ramsey Fill, Pequest Fill, Lubber Run Fill, Slateford Junction, Wharton Fill, and McMickle Cut (Lackawanna Cut-Off) articles do not seem to meet notability requirements (WP:GNG), with little significant coverage. The sections on construction can be merged into this article.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:24, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius, Pi.1415926535, Mackensen, WallyFromColumbia, and PRRfan: I just wanted to ping all of you about this. Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 20:04, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I think most of these can be merged, as they consist of simple statistics which aren't notable on their own per WP:NOTSTATS. The possible exceptions are Colby Cut and Pequest Fill, which do have more substantive info about the features themselves. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unpersuaded that any of these need have separate articles. Mackensen (talk) 20:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all per nom. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Except maybe Pequest Fill because it was a record setter when it was built. The rest have zero independent notability. oknazevad (talk) 21:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all except Pequest Fill per nom and my comments above. After looking at Colby Cut again, I realized that it only includes stats and etymology. It doesn't appear to be notable otherwise. – Epicgenius (talk) 21:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all except Pequest Fill, to which I've lately added a half-dozen or so citations that buttress its claim to notability. PRRfan (talk) 01:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]