Jump to content

Talk:Marriage Act 1961 (Australia)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marriage solely for immigration?

[edit]

if marriage was only to bring someone from overseas and one of the parties was forced to marry is it duress and fraud and does it constitute a void marriage?

Before 1961 Act

[edit]

There is not one word about what preceded the 1961 Act and this information is generally difficult to find on Wiki. Too many commentators of marriage only go back this far yet want to claim tradition as a key factor in preventing marriage equality. Is the inherent unfairness of marriage prior to this Act why this history is missing from both wiki and conservative activism? Ericglare (talk) 10:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Marriage Act 1961 (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Marriage Act 1961 (Australia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parliament of Australia Outline

[edit]

Wikipedia page Marriage Act 1961 (Australia) does not explain the context of why the Act was introduced. Instead, the page deviates from the Act 1961 thru the Sexual Discrimination Amendment Act 1991 the to the Amendment Act 2004 in order to repeat the point that same sex marriage is not permitted. This is more a case of intended waffle than an account of the facts. The page incorrectly includes a section on the "current status of the Marriage Amendment Act". This section is out of date and refers to a spurious selection on where certain politicians stood on the issue over the past decade. The section ignores the currency of the debate over a plebiscite on same-sex marriage versus the role of Parliament to legislate directly on this.

What's missing?

  • 1) A satisfactory consolidation of the Marriage Act in Australia.
  • 2) Marriage Acts of Australian States/self-governing colonies & historical view of marriage.
  • 3) The jurisdiction of Australian marriage law under the Constitution.
  • 4) The background to and detail of the Marriage Act 1961 (e.g. debate about polygamy vs conventional view of marriage).
  • 5) The background to the Marriage Amendment Act 2004 (e.g. debate about same-sex marriage vs the view of the Howard Government).
  • 6) Proposed plebiscite on same-sex marriage by the Coalition vs advocates for Parliament to vote directly on the issue.

-- 124.148.65.94 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) 14:06, 16 July 2017‎