Talk:Mike Lindell

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mike Lindell article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

view · edit

Frequently asked questions

This page is biased towards/against Lindell because it mentions (or doesn't mention) X! Why won't you fix it?

Having a neutral point of view does not mean giving equal weight to all viewpoints. Rather, it refers to Wikipedia's effort to discuss topics and viewpoints in a roughly equal proportion to the degree that they are discussed in reliable sources, which in political articles is mostly mainstream media. For further information, please read Wikipedia:Guide to addressing bias.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Ewan Palmer (2021-03-01). "Mike Lindell Says Over 20 Retailers Have Dropped MyPillow, Calls Wikipedia 'Corrupt'". Newsweek. Retrieved 2021-03-02. Wikipedia has taken over my Wikipedia, another terrible organization, corrupt," Lindell adds. "And I could say that right here at Wikipedia, very corrupt.

Section sizes

Section size for Mike Lindell (12 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	8,193	8,193
Background	2,283	2,283
Career	251	13,783
My Pillow	5,287	5,287
Frank	8,245	8,245
Philanthropy	1,915	1,915
Political activities	18,454	61,085
Promotion of unproven medical treatments	2,793	2,793
Attempts to overturn 2020 presidential election	39,838	39,838
Personal life	8,948	8,948
References	28	28
External links	860	860
Total	97,095	97,095

infobox picture

@HistorianL: I noticed you replaced the image in Lindell's infobox to one you have taken. While it is great that you've gone ahead and taken a photo of him yourself, we already have higher quality and recent photoportraits of Lindell so please do not replace the picture.

HistorianL's selected image
Higher quality image

―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:09, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it’s obvious which image im voting for. I vote for Option A HistorianL (talk) 20:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a democracy, and please do not let your personal attachment to the photo dictate which photo you will support. It should be obvious that the photo on the left is of a lesser technical quality, considering the odd posture, low resolution, and unprofessional composition. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 20:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The image could be used elsewhere in the article, perhaps to showcase his attendance at the Turning Point Convention with some extra information about his connection to the convention. But, according to MOS:IMAGELEAD, the lead image should be "the type of image used for similar purposes in high-quality reference works." This means that we should avoid the usage of casual selfies if we have photographs by professional photographers available.

Also, please do not remove people's comments on the talk page without good reason, see WP:TPO. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 20:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the status quo image at while people reach consensus here. I have no opinion myself, just noting that there is a third image in the running here. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 20:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm honestly fine with the status quo image remaining. It's of high technical quality, although the posture of Lindell is a bit awkward with his neck twisting like that. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 20:41, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

correct, it's not a democracy. It's a republic. Saying he is a conspiracy theorists is like said Biden didn't have document. Which until now was totally illegal, he was never in a position to. Where is the FBI raid? Wiki leans so far left if the world was flat, wiki would fall off. 2600:1009:B17C:4606:6484:665F:AD16:8C3C (talk) 11:36, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I like the eager enthusiasm of the new pic and its prominent display of Mike's signature crucifix. SPECIFICO talk 16:49, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

False news networks as verified sources.

you must stop using 2600:100B:B020:AC44:DCBD:F69E:55F9:C75D (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Too REMOVE THE CONSPIRACY TITLE. THIS IS DEFERMATION OF HIS NAME. PATRIOT IS CORRECT WORD! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.250.179.39 (talk) 06:28, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The term is well-sourced in the article. Tollens (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

i request to remove conspiracy theorist as that is someone's opinion not fact. A conspiracy theory is just that.a theory. So it is an idea bot a fact. Like Wikipedia spreads conspiracy theory. See how that is my opinion and not a fact. 2600:1007:B009:F08:58A8:A3CD:B517:5A13 (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources say about a topic, and they say Mr. Lindell is a conspiracy theorist. You are free to disagree with that, but that doesn't change what the sources say. You are free to get those sources to change how they describe Mr. Lindell first, or to offer sources that claim he is not a conspiracy theorist and has proven his theories in court(which he hasn't). 331dot (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 September 2024 (2)

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add Controversy section:

Mike Lindell is facing backlash online after his company marked down some of its pillows to $14.88, a figure seen as symbolic for white supremacists and neo-Nazis.

On Friday, Lindell and his MyPillow business advertised the discounted products on social media, promising consumers the “ultimate comfort upgrade.”

“Sleep like a dream with our Standard MyPillow for just $14.88!” the posts read in part.

On social media, Mike Lindell advertised his MyPillow products for $14.88. On social media, Mike Lindell advertised his MyPillow products for $14.88. MyPillow / X Below an image of Lindell holding two pillows is a large graphic prominently displaying the price.

The number “1488” is a common symbol used among hate groups. The “14” is shorthand for the “14 Words,” a stand-in for a white supremacist slogan, while “88” refers to an abbreviation of “Heil Hitler,” since H is the eighth letter of the alphabet.

The posts were shared on major platforms like Instagram, TikTok, Facebook and X, formerly Twitter. As of Saturday afternoon, the posts remained online, with hundreds of comments denouncing Lindell.

A spokesperson for MyPillow did not return a request for comment. Lindell could not be reached for comment.

Lindell, a staunch ally of former President Donald Trump, has repeatedly boosted conspiracy theories falsely claiming that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from Trump.

In 2021, Lindell offered $5 million to anyone who could win his “Prove Mike Wrong Challenge” by disproving data related to his election fraud claims.

In February, a judge confirmed that Lindell had to pay $5 million to a computer forensics expert who successfully took on Lindell’s challenge. Lindell recently handed over financial documents in the case as the expert tried to collect the money. 126.173.55.84 (talk) 13:24, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't provide sources for these claims. We don't normally do "controversy" sections(see WP:CRIT)- we just state the topic areas, as this article already does. If you have sources for this information, it may be possible to add it. 331dot (talk) 13:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: As pointed out by 331dot, this fails on WP:CRIT. It also doesn't seem to be neutrally worded enough to pass WP:BLP. Finally, the edit request template is only for uncontroversial edits. These sort of changes should first have a consensus developed, rather than being made via the template. PianoDan (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]