Talk:Paul Skallas
 | This article was nominated for merging with Lindy effect on September 13 2024. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was Merge. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 August 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge. Skallas is notable in his own right, but not more than the Lindy effect. Therefore, let them sit together in beautiful coexistence. Ornov Ganguly TALK 13:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Wikipedians. I have read the deletion nomination and come to the conclusion that Skallas is WP:NOTABLE, but just not worth an article on his own. He rides the Lindy effect, and so is better suited there where the NYT and Politico sources will have better value. Meet us there. Ornov Ganguly TALK 02:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.