Jump to content

Talk:Philipp, Prince of Eulenburg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Children and descendants

[edit]

His younger children only had the title "Graf zu Eulenburg" (not Prinz, and not und Hertefeld, and not Graf von Sandels). I have removed the information about grandchildren and other descendants; this is not usual in Wikipedia articles. Noel S McFerran (talk) 03:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This title is horrible

[edit]

Nobody ever calls him "The Prince of Eulenburg". And why are we anglicizing his given name? I'm not sure what the best title would be (maybe "Prince Philipp of Eulenburg"?), but this certainly isn't it. We don't have "Otto, Prince of Bismarck." john k (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's a mess. Particularly changing Philipp to Philip, which no other encyclopaedia recognises. And as Wikipedia's own naming conventions state: "If an examination of the sources in an article shows that one name or version of the name stands out as clearly the most commonly used in the English language, we should follow the sources and use it." See the outcome of the discussion on German naming here. [1] I've added the additional 'p' to his Christian name (as per the body of the article), but retained 'zu' as 'of' in the first instance, while providing the titles as German in the first mention, which is also common on Wikipedia. Some add a rollover note to explain Graf. Engleham (talk) 17:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article length

[edit]

Re your tags, I suggest that the lede is adequate, and the article is much too long, right out of proportion to the notability of the subject. Valetude (talk) 00:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Philipp, Prince of Eulenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]