Jump to content

Talk:Piper PA-38 Tomahawk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NASA vs. NACA

[edit]

I've just reverted for the second time the implied claim that the NACA—dissolved in 1958—was conducting airfoil research in the early 1970s. I've also added a reference—to a NASA source on the matter—and so I hope this will end the NACA business. But, just for later reference, in case this comes back again, two other sources:
http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1977/PV1977_312.pdf
http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/1976/PV1976_217.pdf
SkipperPilot 15:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I frequently see these newer airfoils referred to by a NACA number. I think the confusion comes from the fact that NACA originated the numbering system for many airfoils. However, I agree that the Tomahawk airfoil does not fit in with the older NACA numbering system and is also a NASA developed airfoil.

Traumahawk

[edit]

I have heard this epithet applied to the PA-38 by three different owners as well as a number of former PA-38 renter pilots. It seems to be a point of pride. Ahunt 18:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Terrorhawk" is also not uncommon! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.45.246 (talk) 17:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At one time we had a whole list of these names in the article, but the rest were removed as unsourced. If you can provide a reliable reference we can include this. - Ahunt (talk) 18:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spins

[edit]

Regarding [1], you were absolutely right, I assumed some 2nd hand info I had gotten was right and didn't check source. It IS rated for spins, I'll be darned. - Chairboy 03:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It has been a while since I set foot in a Tomahawk, but if memory serves, they were placarded "Intentional spins prohibited". I recall reading somewhere a few years ago that the production model PA-38 was modified from the original design, removing one or two ribs from each wing. Aside from reduced construction cost, the result was a more flexible wing that had a tendency to twist, making spin recovery difficult, or in some situations even impossible. I got my primary training in the Tomahawk, and the the instructor either didn't know about it, or chose not to tell me. When I took my check ride, the examiner was terrified of performing full stalls, and deemed it sufficient that I could recognize and recover from an imminent stall. I presume this was because he knew a botched stall recovery can easily lead to a spin. Anyone out there know more about the Tomahawk's design history? --QuicksilverT @ 01:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The FAA never revoked the PA-38's approval for intentional spins. However the aircraft modifications really did happen. Dstroma (talk) 07:39, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I trained on an early Tomahawk (one of the first in Australia) and not only full stalls, but spin recovery was practised. Compared to the Cessna 152 I started on, it stalled quite abruptly and could easily be made to enter a full spin. Manual recovery was rapid though, at least on the model I was flying. I only read about student/instructor unrecoverable spin fatalities years later, so not sure if the early examples had the modified, lighter wing. Sid the Obscure (talk) 00:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tomahawk spins

[edit]

Tomahawks are approved for intentional spins, this certification has never been removed.

Piper did NOT remove ribs to cut costs.

and if you cant recover from a tomahawk spin.. odds are you cant recover from a spin in any aircraft.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.230.232.48 (talkcontribs) 17:56, 8 May 2006

The previous anonymous comment is completely wrong. Piper did remove wing ribs and made other substantial modifications to the PA-38 after FAA certification. It is well documented, such as in this NTSB report[2]. I have just added the info to the article. Dstroma (talk) 06:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good going - the info and associated refs look good! The Type certificate says:
"FLAPS UP SPINS ARE APPROVED FOR UTILITY CATEGORY OPERATION. FOR SPIN RECOVERY, USE FULL RUDDER AGAINST THE SPIN FOLLOWED IMMEDIATELY BY FORWARD WHEEL."
and
"FLAPS EXTENDED SPINS PROHIBITED"
- Ahunt (talk) 11:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I recall there was a also placard in the cockpit somewhere about this, but my memory is over 30 years old now. I recall I spun a Tomahawk only on one flight, with my instructor. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]