Talk:Re Kevin – validity of marriage of transsexual

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Re Kevin – validity of marriage of transsexual is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Surely this article deserves a better title! DJ Clayworth 16:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't agree more - but what? Ambi 14:39, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

See: http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/2001-02/02rn16.htm. I don't think we'll be able to do any better :) -- Ash Lux ^{(talk | contribs)} 04:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 October 2024

It has been proposed in this section that Re Kevin – validity of marriage of transsexual be renamed and moved to Re Kevin.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Re Kevin – validity of marriage of transsexual → Re Kevin – No need for a longer title, which also sounds wrongly decapitalized or missing a letter/word. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Australian law, alian Wikipedians' notice board, WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, and WikiProject Law have been notified of this discussion. --MikutoH ^talk! 22:59, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support Re Kevin — it is WP:CONCISE,WP:PRECISE and WP:COMMONNAME (per Google Scholar). It's also sufficiently unique on its own, as far as I can tell. Re Kevin (Validity of Marriage of Transsexual) (2001) (with brackets, caps and date) is more commonly used than the current title, but is still used less than Re Kevin (and I'm sure Ngrams will show the same). If we need to differentiate it somehow (perhaps at a later date), adding (2001) would probably be sufficient at that point. Lewisguile (talk) 06:57, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]