Talk:Recon
Appearance
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move 10 October 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
– Move both to create primary redirects to Reconnaissance, the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 06:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is this a bit too much of a WP:DICT situation, though? Also, the hatnote on top of Reconnaissance is already a bit long. --Joy (talk) 07:12, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Reconnaissance is definitely a full-fledged article, not a dictionary entry. I've cleaned up the hatnote. 162 etc. (talk) 00:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Very, very clear primary redirects. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support Obvious primary topics. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support "Recon → Recon (disambiguation)" per nom. Obvious primary grab there. Neutral on the Recce move since I've never heard of that term before, so I cannot support or oppose. Steel1943 (talk) 05:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Recce is the Commonwealth English version of Recon. It's used in exactly the same way. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:11, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. In. the words of the article Reconnaissance: "in military jargon, reconnaissance is abbreviated to recce (British, Canadian, Australian English) and to recon (American English)." I note RECCE already redirects there. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)