Jump to content

Talk:SABR volatility model

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening heading

[edit]

The formula is wrong!!! That is not a proper copy from the original article formula!

Previous comment

[edit]

The formulas in the article are, in fact, the original formulas written in a somewhat different but equivalent form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProfessorTarantoga (talkcontribs) 02:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

special case of ATM

[edit]

This article should have the special case of ATM, the general formula blows up when strike=future

Previous comment

[edit]

Good point, one cannot simply substitute strike = forward. The ATM case has to be handled as the limit strike -> forward, which can easily be calculated using l'Hopital's rule. This is important when one implements the formuala in computer code (which will otherwise blow up).


Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]



SABR Volatility ModelSABR volatility model

Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 23:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.