Jump to content

Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSan Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSan Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022 is part of the San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 15, 2023Good article nomineeListed
February 27, 2023Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Emerging artists

[edit]

67 artists are in bold, while only 66 qualified and I can't manage to find the one that shouldn't be. Also, the link to the "convocations" has already been changed so it an archive may be needed. Thank you Yoyo360 (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed. Grk1011 (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @The C of E: checking in just in case you forgot about this. No rush. Grk1011 (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Are there any links for the writers in the opening paragraph?
  • Can we link the years for the 3 consecutive Austrian performances, for consistency
  • Any subsequent reasons why the emerging acts were absent?
  • Was there any subsequent punishment for the jury scandal beyond using aggregate scores?
  • Is ESCToday a print source? IF not, it shouldn't be in WP:ITALICS
    • Same for Eurovoix
  • There are multiple WP:BLUE links for SMRTV in the references
  • Sources 17, 37 and 54, i'm not sure WikiBlogs is an WP:RS
  • Source 55, Out is a print source and should be italicised
  • Source 56, Metro is considered generally unreliable under WP:RSP