Jump to content

Talk:Spacefaring

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2008

[edit]

what about Brazil's launch of a Brazilian astronaut in 2004? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.161.184.165 (talkcontribs) 20:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also the Italian San Marco!! [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.162.150 (talkcontribs) 09:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Italy was not the 4th country to launch a satellite, but the third, since the launch of the first San Marco A satellite happened in December 1964, as outlined in this article from the Italian Wikipedia and here. Although for the whole San Marco Program the launchers were always provided by the NASA, I'm unsure whether it is correct to state that the country "has never developed any launch capability of its own". In fact, Italy built a launch platform and a control platform in Kenya. The latter is still active, while the launch platform is not used since the late 80s. I tried myself to modify the list in the main article but gave up after re-iterated cancellation of Italy from the list. Hopefully this comment will stay a bit longer... :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.159.141.53 (talkcontribs) 10:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move (2011)

[edit]

A better title for this article would be List of spacefaring nations, since that's what the article is about, as well as to differentiate the content from spaceflight in general. "Spacefaring" is an adjective, and therefore is not an ideal article title. Mlm42 (talk) 01:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at this one year later, it would appear this proposal never got any support. I'm noting that here, as the fact that the article is not focused merely on nation states is relevant to the proposal I will make in the next section. N2e (talk) 04:25, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article has non-neutral POV

[edit]

The article, based on it's current title (Spacefaring), is not merely about Spacefaring nations. Nevertheless, the article seems to have a strong nation-centric POV. With a number of private enterprises working on spaceflight launch vehicles, and several of them currently developing orbital vehicles (Stratolaunch Systems, arguably others) and other companies having announced plans to do so, it seems like the nation-centric POV should now be reduced, even if it might have been appropriate previously in describing the first 50 years of spaceflight.

Specifically, at least one private company, Space Exploration Technologies (aka SpaceX), has already developed two orbital launch vehicles (Falcon 1 and Falcon 9) and has completed four successful orbital launches to date. Arguably, the Russian 1992 Europe-America 500 was a private spaceflight.

So my proposal is to update the prose to reflect a more neutral point-of-view, one that works for both nation states and national space entities, as well as private space transportation providers. Any thoughts from other editors? N2e (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceX first commercial launch, 8th of October, 2012.

[edit]

Someone close to this article should update it. SpaceX launch was successful. RIP public funded space exploration, hello Mars colony. BaSH PR0MPT (talk) 10:31, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spacefaring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Spacefaring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merger (2018)

[edit]

There is a suggestion to merge Spacefaring to Spaceflight. See talk:Spaceflight -- 17:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)