Jump to content

Talk:Spiral (Pendulum song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Spiral (Pendulum song)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox
  • Green tickY A lead section giving an overview of the single
  • Green tickY A track listing
  • Green tickY Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current single; a band navbox is insufficient)
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year

C-class:

  • Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  • Green tickY At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Green tickY A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians
  • Red XN Reliable independent in-line references supporting claims
    Hard To Find Records is not a reliable source, some claims unsupported
  • Green tickY A casual reader should learn something about the song/single

B-class:

  • Red XN All the C-class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Red XN No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources
    – Lead section needs additional in-line references, all sources need to be reliable
  • Red XN No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
    – Lead section contains information that should be under appropriate section headings, the lead should summarise the entire article
  • Red XN No obvious omissions, but also no obvious extraneous information – such as "trivia"
    – No information outside lead section on background, writing, marketing or release
Evaluation based on WikiProject Albums assessment scale. Please update this list when the article meets (or fails to meet) any of the above criteria, changing the article's class assessment as appropriate. Last reviewed by – Ikara talk → 20:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 21:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)